Think of a tribe of small, slow, social mammals persisting in the face of a ruthless wilderness by means of absolute social cohesion. Understanding each other was not optional in such an environment. Anything that introduced overhead and slowed efficiency in group coordination posed an immediate threat to the entire group and had to be made to fit as fast as possible or be permanently excluded.
Coordinative maintenance in smaller groups, where everyone could realistically maintain an experiential connection with everyone else, was entirely functional through relational instinct (L3) and emotion (L4) alone. In our case though, a persistent pressure emergedâdue to the advent of tooling and the use of fireâthat gave our species an edge in warding off outside threats and subsequently started to push group size more and more beyond the limit of experiential cohesion.
As a result, any mammal part of that tribe found itself having to navigate increasingly complex social structures and because exclusion still meant certain death, a self-fuelling spiral ensued. The more uncertainty about social reality increased, the more finely calibrated awareness of oneâs place within the group became in an ongoing effort to ward off the threat of exclusion. This increase in awareness in turn provided even more collective capability to triumph over outside threats. Who is allied with whom? Who remembers our last mistake? Who trusts us? Who is becoming influential? What did that glance mean? The organism that could more accurately simulate invisible social dynamics survived more often than the organism reacting only to immediate cues.
Through time and increasing social complexity, that continued to give rise to an adaptation capable of modelling othersâ models of oneself based on fragmentary experiential information. Hence, our ancestral tribes gradually became increasingly capable communities of collective survival, continually selecting for one capability above all others: predictive simulation. A recursive turnâfrom âI model youâ to âI model your model of meâ to âI model myself modelling your model of meâ emerged to navigate that social complexity.
Cognition.
When immediate interaction was occurring we were capable of maintaining and smoothing it through direct ongoing interaction, relational coherence. As soon as immediate interaction was no longer occurring with an agent, the organism was forced to maintain continuity through a stored abstraction of the self as it existed in that agentâs perception. Symbolic coherence emerged right there for the first time, through severance of the continuous stream of relational input, carrying forward a simulated model of how the self existed in the minds of others, based on the latest interaction.
As this capacity for conscious abstraction continued to increase alongside group size, increasingly sophisticated symbolic tools and maps emerged to facilitate larger group cohesion. This too was an astonishing and naturally emerging survival adaptation. Eventually, these adaptations became so successful that the primary threat to group survival shifted from natureâs uncertainty to the uncertainty posed by other groups carrying competing symbolic maps. Speech, language, art, stories, myths, religions, writing, accounting, ideology, law, science, technologyâthey emerged as tools to increase group cohesion, coordination and capability in an ongoing effort to remain strong enough to persist in the face of adversity. History is full of examples of how weaker symbolic adaptations got pruned without mercy when more successful ones pushed into new territory.
As a result of unconscious and evolutionary lower layer pressure, all emerging self-models inside these groups naturally grew and inhabited the symbolic maps they were born into as they continued to seek ongoing intra-group validation in an effort to survive. These increasingly sophisticated symbolic maps were therefore never experienced as maps, but as reality itself leading to the tragedy of a species that continued to gain outer mastery over natural threats while remaining its own worst enemy. Humanityâs exile from nature began the moment conscious symbolic abstraction came into being.
Our species became self-aware, but individuals continued avoiding becoming too self-aware through the introspective interrogation of inherited assumptions. This was never a failure of intelligence or courage. It remained adaptive for as long as questioning inherited assumptions carried existential risk.
The nervous system did not evolve to distinguish between âmy beliefs are wrongâ and âmy social status within the group is collapsing, therefore Iâm going to die.â For hundreds of thousands of years, those possibilities were deeply entangled. To question the symbolic structures that held the tribe together wasnât experienced as a harmless intellectual exercise. It carried the possibility of ridicule, loss of status, exclusion, abandonment and, for most of our evolutionary history, death. Each generation therefore inherited not only symbolic maps, but nervous systems increasingly calibrated to experience uncertainty about those maps as uncertainty about survival itself.
The underlying computation never changed. Only its object did.
First, the fear of uncertainty accurately predicted the possibility of predators. Then it accurately predicted a detrimental threat of exclusion. As symbolic abstraction grew and life became safer, we came to predict inconsistency with our own place inside those maps organising group belonging as threat. The organism learned to experience uncertainty about its inherited worldview, its values and even its own identity as though they carried the same existential significance. What had once protected the body from nature gradually became a mechanism protecting symbolic coherence from revision.
Over the millennia, a host of premature closures masquerading as truth installed themselves, as discussed in The Symmetry of Truth and The Coherence Stack Spectrum. These symbolic inheritances were never experienced as provisional compressions of reality. They were experienced as reality itself. When they were challenged, the body often responded before the mind had even evaluated the evidence. Defending an abstraction felt indistinguishable from defending oneself.
As we let that fully land, we realise how misguided the notion that we perceive reality in any objective sense actually is. We make that assertion using a nervous system that evolved into self-awareness under the relentless pressure of maintaining inclusion within increasingly complex social structures, and still carries the subconscious imprints of that journey. The world we consciously believe ourselves to perceive is therefore always filtered through predictive architectures shaped long before conscious thought existed.
Humanityâs departure from the Garden of Eden was never rooted in self-awareness but in mistaking its accumulating and intergenerational residue for reality itself. It began the moment we became capable of creating, storing and passing on symbolic abstractions yet remained incapable of fully completing the inner recursive act of relativizing and verifying what weâve inherited.
We took a bite from the apple, but could never quite finish it due to the heavy toll it asked of the individualâuntil now. Numerous pioneers before me created pathways for reasoned doubt in the face of inherited assumptions which enabled stabilisation at a deeper, more accurate level than the generations before. They forged the very steps beneath my feet as I undertook my own journey.
Standing on their shoulders, and driven by my own curiosity, I broke through another ceiling and was able to create a causal map of this inner terrain in the hopes that it might catalyse a process of experiential reconciliation between humanity and nature. It guides the individual from identifying with inherited abstractions to recognising them as the adaptive tools theyâve always beenârendering them transparent in the process while remaining personally functional and socially embedded.
Perhaps it is time to finish the apple.
Eden. Great to be back. đ±
PS: The irony of offering a symbolic map to guide a way out of the tyranny of symbolic maps isnât lost on me, thatâs why this map was written to become obsolete the moment it has done its job.
The Next Steps
Learn more about A Thinker In Nature đ±
Subscribe to this free publication to receive
ongoing essays that provide a fresh WHAT HOLDS? perspective to known issues.
access to a CustomGPT built for self-reflection that can help you with interpreting your own everyday experience.
Join the journey and download the map that guides you through the recalibration of your own nervous system as an operational manual here:
WHAT HOLDS? â The Recursive Logic of Experience: A Manual for Mind
It comes with lifetime updates and the option to join a select reader and introspection community where I participate, answer questions and gather feedback for further development.